Detail publikace

Comparison of different sensors used in the assessment of concrete elements by the Impact-Echo method

PUCHÝŘ, J. DVOŘÁK, R. HUBÁČEK, A. CHOBOLA, Z.

Originální název

Comparison of different sensors used in the assessment of concrete elements by the Impact-Echo method

Anglický název

Comparison of different sensors used in the assessment of concrete elements by the Impact-Echo method

Jazyk

en

Originální abstrakt

Testing methods used for assessment of buildings considered as a cultural heritage are focused mainly on non-destructive testing methods. Old buildings are usually sensitive to destructive in-situ testing, and a variety of non-destructive techniques (NDT) are frequently used [1; 2]. One of the most often used sensors are accelerometers, which can measure vibrations of different part of structures. These can be used in either continuous monitoring or in short-time assessment. ImpactEcho is a well-known method which can locate defects, caverns, or damaged parts not only in industry-level structures, but also in preservation of cultural heritage [3]. This type of measurement requires attaching a sensor to the surface of the observed element. This is in most cases done by adhesives which can damage the more porous structures. In this paper a comparison of two different sensor types in testing of reference concrete elements is presented: contact piezoceramic accelerometer; non-contact MEMS type microphone. Signals recorded by each sensor type are assessed by the statistical method of feature extraction.

Anglický abstrakt

Testing methods used for assessment of buildings considered as a cultural heritage are focused mainly on non-destructive testing methods. Old buildings are usually sensitive to destructive in-situ testing, and a variety of non-destructive techniques (NDT) are frequently used [1; 2]. One of the most often used sensors are accelerometers, which can measure vibrations of different part of structures. These can be used in either continuous monitoring or in short-time assessment. ImpactEcho is a well-known method which can locate defects, caverns, or damaged parts not only in industry-level structures, but also in preservation of cultural heritage [3]. This type of measurement requires attaching a sensor to the surface of the observed element. This is in most cases done by adhesives which can damage the more porous structures. In this paper a comparison of two different sensor types in testing of reference concrete elements is presented: contact piezoceramic accelerometer; non-contact MEMS type microphone. Signals recorded by each sensor type are assessed by the statistical method of feature extraction.

Dokumenty

BibTex


@inproceedings{BUT175937,
  author="Jan {Puchýř} and Richard {Dvořák} and Adam {Hubáček} and Zdeněk {Chobola}",
  title="Comparison of different sensors used in the assessment of concrete 
elements by the Impact-Echo method",
  annote="Testing methods used for assessment of buildings considered as a cultural heritage are 
focused mainly on non-destructive testing methods. Old buildings are usually sensitive to destructive 
in-situ testing, and a variety of non-destructive techniques (NDT) are frequently used [1; 2]. One of 
the most often used sensors are accelerometers, which can measure vibrations of different part of 
structures. These can be used in either continuous monitoring or in short-time assessment. ImpactEcho is a well-known method which can locate defects, caverns, or damaged parts not only in 
industry-level structures, but also in preservation of cultural heritage [3]. This type of measurement 
requires attaching a sensor to the surface of the observed element. This is in most cases done by 
adhesives which can damage the more porous structures. In this paper a comparison of two different 
sensor types in testing of reference concrete elements is presented: contact piezoceramic 
accelerometer; non-contact MEMS type microphone. Signals recorded by each sensor type are 
assessed by the statistical method of feature extraction.",
  address="ČVUT",
  chapter="175937",
  howpublished="print",
  institution="ČVUT",
  year="2021",
  month="november",
  publisher="ČVUT"
}