Detail publikačního výsledku

Assessment of empirical formulae for determining the hydraulic conductivity of glass beads

ŘÍHA, J.; PETRULA, L.; HALA, M.; ALHASAN, Z.

Originální název

Assessment of empirical formulae for determining the hydraulic conductivity of glass beads

Anglický název

Assessment of empirical formulae for determining the hydraulic conductivity of glass beads

Druh

Článek WoS

Originální abstrakt

Empirical formulae are often used in practice to quickly and cheaply determine the hydraulic conductivity of soil. Numerous relations based on dimensional analysis and experimental measurements have been published for the determination of hydraulic conductivity since the end of 19th century. In this paper, 20 available empirical formulae are listed, converted and re-arranged into SI units. Experimental research was carried out concerning hydraulic conductivity for three glass bead size (diameters 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm) and variable porosity. The series of experiments consisted of 177 separate tests conducted in order to obtain relevant statistical sets. The validity of various published porosity functions and empirical formulae was verified with the use of the experimental data obtained from the glass beads. The best fit was provided by the porosity function n3/(1–n)2. In the case of the estimation of the hydraulic conductivity of uniform glass beads, the best fit was exhibited by formulae published by Terzaghi, Kozeny, Carman, Zunker and Chapuis et al.

Anglický abstrakt

Empirical formulae are often used in practice to quickly and cheaply determine the hydraulic conductivity of soil. Numerous relations based on dimensional analysis and experimental measurements have been published for the determination of hydraulic conductivity since the end of 19th century. In this paper, 20 available empirical formulae are listed, converted and re-arranged into SI units. Experimental research was carried out concerning hydraulic conductivity for three glass bead size (diameters 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm) and variable porosity. The series of experiments consisted of 177 separate tests conducted in order to obtain relevant statistical sets. The validity of various published porosity functions and empirical formulae was verified with the use of the experimental data obtained from the glass beads. The best fit was provided by the porosity function n3/(1–n)2. In the case of the estimation of the hydraulic conductivity of uniform glass beads, the best fit was exhibited by formulae published by Terzaghi, Kozeny, Carman, Zunker and Chapuis et al.

Klíčová slova

Hydraulic conductivity; Empirical formulae; Porosity; Porosity function configuration.

Klíčová slova v angličtině

Hydraulic conductivity; Empirical formulae; Porosity; Porosity function configuration.

Autoři

ŘÍHA, J.; PETRULA, L.; HALA, M.; ALHASAN, Z.

Rok RIV

2019

Vydáno

14.08.2018

Nakladatel

De Gruyter Open

Místo

Česká republika

ISSN

0042-790X

Periodikum

Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics

Svazek

66

Číslo

3

Stát

Slovenská republika

Strany od

337

Strany do

347

Strany počet

11

URL

http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/johh.2018.66.issue-3/johh-2018-0021/johh-2018-0021.xml?format=INT

Plný text v Digitální knihovně

http://hdl.handle.net/11012/85322

BibTex

@article{BUT149232,
  author="Jaromír {Říha} and Lubomír {Petrula} and Mario {Hala} and Zakaraya {Alhasan}",
  title="Assessment of empirical formulae for determining the hydraulic conductivity of glass beads",
  journal="Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics",
  year="2018",
  volume="66",
  number="3",
  pages="337--347",
  doi="10.2478/johh-2018-0021",
  issn="0042-790X",
  url="http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/johh.2018.66.issue-3/johh-2018-0021/johh-2018-0021.xml?format=INT"
}

Dokumenty

2018_66_3_Riha_337