Detail publikačního výsledku

Comparison of 60 GHz and 80 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channels Using Delay and Doppler Characteristics

PROKEŠ, A.; MIKULÁŠEK, T.; VYCHODIL, J.; ZÁVORKA, R.; BLUMENSTEIN, J.; WOJTUŃ, J.; KELNER, J.; ZIÓŁKOWSKI, C.; CHANDRA, A.

Originální název

Comparison of 60 GHz and 80 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channels Using Delay and Doppler Characteristics

Anglický název

Comparison of 60 GHz and 80 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channels Using Delay and Doppler Characteristics

Druh

Stať ve sborníku mimo WoS a Scopus

Originální abstrakt

The aim of this paper is to provide a comparison of channel characteristics for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication at 60 GHz and 80 GHz frequency bands in a high-mobility scenario where two vehicles pass each other in opposite directions. The study is based on measurements of the time-varying channel impulse response capturing the behavior of multi-path propagation during vehicle motion. By directly comparing these two frequency bands under identical measurement conditions, we attempt to quantify the differences in power delay profile, root mean square (RMS) delay spread, RMS Doppler spread, and intervals (regions) of stationarity in time domain. The results show that these bands do not differ significantly, but the 80 GHz band exhibits somewhat greater RMS delay spread and RMS Doppler spread when calculated over the entire delay-Doppler spectrum, and conversely exhibits shorter stationarity regions. However, the characteristics of the measurement setup in the two bands and their influence on comparative measurements must be considered. In particular, attention must be paid to the impact of antennas.

Anglický abstrakt

The aim of this paper is to provide a comparison of channel characteristics for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication at 60 GHz and 80 GHz frequency bands in a high-mobility scenario where two vehicles pass each other in opposite directions. The study is based on measurements of the time-varying channel impulse response capturing the behavior of multi-path propagation during vehicle motion. By directly comparing these two frequency bands under identical measurement conditions, we attempt to quantify the differences in power delay profile, root mean square (RMS) delay spread, RMS Doppler spread, and intervals (regions) of stationarity in time domain. The results show that these bands do not differ significantly, but the 80 GHz band exhibits somewhat greater RMS delay spread and RMS Doppler spread when calculated over the entire delay-Doppler spectrum, and conversely exhibits shorter stationarity regions. However, the characteristics of the measurement setup in the two bands and their influence on comparative measurements must be considered. In particular, attention must be paid to the impact of antennas.

Klíčová slova

V2V channel, millieter wave, channel impulse response, delay-Doppler spectrum, delay spread, stationarity regions

Klíčová slova v angličtině

V2V channel, millieter wave, channel impulse response, delay-Doppler spectrum, delay spread, stationarity regions

Autoři

PROKEŠ, A.; MIKULÁŠEK, T.; VYCHODIL, J.; ZÁVORKA, R.; BLUMENSTEIN, J.; WOJTUŃ, J.; KELNER, J.; ZIÓŁKOWSKI, C.; CHANDRA, A.

Vydáno

10.11.2025

Nakladatel

IEEE

Místo

Bangalore, India

ISBN

979-8-3315-9193-9

Kniha

2025 IEEE Future Networks World Forum (FNWF)

Strany od

1

Strany do

7

Strany počet

7

URL

BibTex

@inproceedings{BUT201252,
  author="Aleš {Prokeš} and Tomáš {Mikulášek} and Josef {Vychodil} and Radek {Závorka} and Jiří {Blumenstein} and Jarosław {Wojtuń} and Jan M. {Kelner} and Cezary {Ziółkowski} and Aniruddha {Chandra}",
  title="Comparison of 60 GHz and 80 GHz Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channels Using Delay and Doppler Characteristics",
  booktitle="2025 IEEE Future Networks World Forum (FNWF)",
  year="2025",
  pages="1--7",
  publisher="IEEE",
  address="Bangalore, India",
  doi="10.1109/fnwf66845.2025.11317288",
  isbn="979-8-3315-9193-9",
  url="https://fnwf2025.ieee.org/"
}