Detail publikačního výsledku

Comparison of methods for evaluation of aerosol deposition in the model of human lungs

BĚLKA, M.; LIPPAY, J.; LÍZAL, F.; JEDELSKÝ, J.; JÍCHA, M.

Originální název

Comparison of methods for evaluation of aerosol deposition in the model of human lungs

Anglický název

Comparison of methods for evaluation of aerosol deposition in the model of human lungs

Druh

Stať ve sborníku v databázi WoS či Scopus

Originální abstrakt

It seems to be very convenient to receive a medicine by inhalation instead of injection. Unfortunately transport of particles and targeted delivery of a drug in human respiratory airways is very complicated task. Therefore we carried out experiments and tested different methods for evaluation of particle deposition in a model of human lungs. The model included respiratory airways from oral cavity to 7th generation of branching. Particles were dispersed by TSI Small-scale Powder Disperser 3433 and delivered to the model. The model was disassembled into segments after the deposition of the particles and local deposition was measured. Two methods were used to analyse the samples, fluorescence spectroscopy and optical microscopy. The first method was based on measuring the intensity of luminescence, which represented the particle deposition. The second method used the optical microscope with phase-contrast objective. A dispersion of isopropanol and particles was filtrated using a vacuum filtration unit, a filter was placed on glass slide and made transparent. The particles on the filter were counted manually and the deposition was calculated afterwards. The results of the methods were compared and both methods proved to be useful.

Anglický abstrakt

It seems to be very convenient to receive a medicine by inhalation instead of injection. Unfortunately transport of particles and targeted delivery of a drug in human respiratory airways is very complicated task. Therefore we carried out experiments and tested different methods for evaluation of particle deposition in a model of human lungs. The model included respiratory airways from oral cavity to 7th generation of branching. Particles were dispersed by TSI Small-scale Powder Disperser 3433 and delivered to the model. The model was disassembled into segments after the deposition of the particles and local deposition was measured. Two methods were used to analyse the samples, fluorescence spectroscopy and optical microscopy. The first method was based on measuring the intensity of luminescence, which represented the particle deposition. The second method used the optical microscope with phase-contrast objective. A dispersion of isopropanol and particles was filtrated using a vacuum filtration unit, a filter was placed on glass slide and made transparent. The particles on the filter were counted manually and the deposition was calculated afterwards. The results of the methods were compared and both methods proved to be useful.

Klíčová slova

Aerosol deposition, optical microscopy, fluorescent spectroscopy, human lungs

Klíčová slova v angličtině

Aerosol deposition, optical microscopy, fluorescent spectroscopy, human lungs

Autoři

BĚLKA, M.; LIPPAY, J.; LÍZAL, F.; JEDELSKÝ, J.; JÍCHA, M.

Rok RIV

2014

Vydáno

25.03.2014

Nakladatel

EDP Sciences

Místo

FRANCE

ISBN

978-80-260-5375-0

Kniha

EPJ Web of Conferences

ISSN

2100-014X

Periodikum

EPJ Web of Conferences

Svazek

67

Číslo

1

Stát

Francouzská republika

Strany od

82

Strany do

85

Strany počet

4

URL

Plný text v Digitální knihovně

BibTex

@inproceedings{BUT104093,
  author="Miloslav {Bělka} and Josef {Lippay} and František {Lízal} and Jan {Jedelský} and Miroslav {Jícha}",
  title="Comparison of methods for evaluation of aerosol deposition in the model of human lungs",
  booktitle="EPJ Web of Conferences",
  year="2014",
  journal="EPJ Web of Conferences",
  volume="67",
  number="1",
  pages="82--85",
  publisher="EDP Sciences",
  address="FRANCE",
  doi="10.1051/epjconf/20146702006",
  isbn="978-80-260-5375-0",
  issn="2100-014X",
  url="https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2014/04/epjconf_efm-13_02006/epjconf_efm-13_02006.html"
}