The thesis fulfils its main objective of developing a feasibility study for a digital two‑sided platform connecting students with startups (85 %), as it systematically evaluates the technical, market, operational, and financial viability of the proposed concept. The methodological approach is appropriate (83 %), combining the UNIDO feasibility framework, Lean Startup methodology and platform economics with both secondary data analysis and qualitative MVP testing conducted on a sample of 17 students and 5 startup representatives; however, the empirical base remains relatively limited and relies predominantly on qualitative insights, without broader quantitative validation. The ability to interpret results and derive conclusions is strong (84 %), particularly in identifying the structural inefficiencies of junior recruitment and translating them into a coherent value proposition based on performance-based validation, although parts of the interpretation remain descriptive and less critically reflective of data limitations. The practical applicability is very high (88 %) and represents a key strength of the thesis: the proposal defines a complete platform solution including technical architecture, business model, go-to-market strategy, and a three-scenario financial model with break-even analysis, demonstrating clear real-world usability; nevertheless, several assumptions (e.g., adoption rates and conversion levels) are not empirically validated and remain hypothetical. The structure, terminology, and language quality are excellent (90 %), with a highly professional and academically consistent style. The use of information sources is solid (85 %), combining academic literature, industry data, and empirical findings, although a deeper critical integration of sources and broader benchmarking would further strengthen the analytical depth. Overall, the thesis represents a well-developed and practically oriented bachelor’s work with a strong focus on feasibility and real-world application; its limitations lie primarily in the depth of empirical validation and reliance on assumptions, corresponding to an overall evaluation of 86 % (B).

Question for defence:

Which assumptions in your financial model do you consider the most critical, and how would changes in these assumptions affect the feasibility conclusion?

The aim of the thesis was to develop a feasibility study for a digital platform connecting students with startups through gamified challenges. The aim is fully fulfilled. The theoretical part is at a high level using the UNIDO framework, Lean Startup methodology, and platform economics — however, more sources could have been utilized. The analytical part is well executed with PESTLE summary table, competitive comparison, Lean Canvas, and MVP testing. As a minor observation, data obtained from primary research could be explicitly cited within the text for better traceability. The interviews could have been more comprehensive for higher validity, but they are appropriate for a bachelor thesis. The author transparently discloses AI tool usage. The proposal part is of high quality — the author approached the topic comprehensively with technical architecture, marketing strategy, and a three-scenario financial model with break-even analysis. The conditional Go recommendation with explicit preconditions demonstrates mature business judgment. I recommend the thesis for defense. Topics for thesis defence:

1. How would you describe the typical B2B partner as a target customer for the platform — what characteristics define an ideal early adopter startup?