Bachelor's Thesis

Design of a family house in the Podkrkonoší region

Final Thesis 1.45 MB Appendix 14.39 MB

Author of thesis: Bc. Jana Vu

Acad. year: 2025/2026

Supervisor: Ing. Pavel Uher, Ph.D.

Reviewer: Ing. Radek Salajka

Abstract:

The Bachelor’s thesis focuses on the design of an energy-efficient house for a
four-member household, located in Úpice in the Hradec Králové Region. The
thesis consists of two parts: the architectural and structural design, and the
design of building services. The house has two above-ground floors, a flat roof,
and a detached garage for two cars. Its L-shaped floor plan creates space for a
winter garden with a terrace above it. The ground floor includes an entrance
hall, a utility room, a bathroom, a toilet, a study, and an open-plan living area
with a kitchen and a dining room. The upper floor contains two bedrooms, a
master bedroom with a walk-in closet, a bathroom, a toilet, and a laundry room.
The building is founded on strip foundations. The load-bearing walls are
designed using acoustic ceramic masonry blocks. Floors and roofs are
constructed as cast-in-place reinforced concrete slabs. The external walls are
insulated with a contact EPS insulation system, and the façade is finished with
natural stone cladding. The heat source is an air-to-water heat pump, which
covers both space heating and domestic hot water preparation. Heat is
distributed through a low-temperature underfloor heating system. Mechanical
ventilation with heat recovery is provided by an Atrea Duplex unit located in the
utility room. The unit provides high indoor air quality and minimises heat losses.
Photovoltaic panels are installed on the flat roof. The system generates 7,115
kWh of electricity per year, reducing the building's grid electricity demand.
Rainwater from the roofs is collected in a 3 m³ storage tank and used for garden
irrigation. The thermal assessment confirms that all building envelope
structures comply with the recommendations of ČSN 73 0540-2, and the
calculated heat loss and energy performance correspond to the parameters of
a nearly zero-energy building.

Keywords:

Single-family house, energy-efficient building, air-to-water heat pump,
mechanical ventilation, flat green roof, photovoltaic panels, Energy
Performance Certificate, underfloor heating

Date of defence

18.06.2026

Result of the defence

Defended (thesis was successfully defended)

znamkaBznamka

Grading

B

Process of defence

Studentka nejprve představila svou bakalářskou práci formou prezentace v PowerPointu, kde popsala jednotlivé vypracované části. Vyjádřila se k připomínkám oponenta a odpovídala na připomínky členů komise. Otázky členů komise: 1. Jakým způsobem pracuje navržený bivalentní zdroj? 2. Je tento návrh tepelného čerpadla vhodný pro vaši lokalitu? 3. Uložení stropní konstrukce a ISO nosník. 4. Jaká je účinnost vaší rekuperace při nízkých teplotách? 5. Jaké jsou detailnější parametry systému chlazení? Studentka velmi dobře reagovala na připomínky oponenta i členů komise a snažila se zdůvodnit navržená a použitá řešení.

Language of thesis

Czech

Faculty

Department

Institute of Building Services

Study programme

Sustainable Building Design (BPC-EVB)

Composition of Committee

doc. Ing. Zuzana Straková, PhD. (předseda)
Ing. Lenka Maurerová, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Pavel Uher, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Olga Rubinová, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Antonín Pekárek (člen)
Ing. Sylva Bantová, Ph.D. (člen)
doc. Ing. Aleš Rubina, Ph.D. (místopředseda)

Supervisor’s report
Ing. Pavel Uher, Ph.D.

Grade proposed by supervisor: A

File inserted by supervisor Size
vedoucí_BP_EVB_Vu.pdf 170,32 kB

Reviewer’s report
Ing. Radek Salajka

Topics for thesis defence:
  1. 2. Dá se ještě nějak využívat užitková voda ve vašem objektu?
  2. 1. Jak se počítají tepelné ztráty větráním při použití nuceného větrání s rekuperací tepla?
  3. 3. Jaký je rozdíl mezi monovalentním a bivalentním systémem tepelného čerpadla?
  4. 4. Jaký byl postup při dimenzování potrubních tras vzduchotechniky?

Grade proposed by reviewer: A

File inserted by the reviewer Size
Posudek oponenta [.pdf] 120,44 kB

Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová