Přístupnostní navigace
E-application
Search Search Close
Master's Thesis
Author of thesis: Lea Starina
Acad. year: 2025/2026
Supervisor: doc. Ing. Pavel Diviš, Ph.D.
Reviewer: Ing. Tomáš Chorazy, Ph.D.
This thesis examines how waste management practices can be improved within an emerging environmental management system at GRAFE Polymer Solutions, a plastics-processing company in Blankenhain, Germany. The study focuses on waste separation as a practical starting point for strengthening environmental management structures and supporting a future ISO 14001-oriented development. Although production-related plastic waste represents the largest waste stream at the company, the empirical intervention concentrated on office and kitchen areas, where improvement was practically feasible within the scope of the thesis. The research followed an applied case-study design combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Waste data from 2023 to 2025 were analysed to identify the main waste streams, disposal routes, and documentation limitations. In addition, on-site observations, a one-week waste characterization study, and semi-structured employee interviews were conducted to examine existing waste separation practices, everyday disposal routines, and perceived barriers to improvement. Based on these findings, a first structured waste separation intervention was developed and implemented in selected office and kitchen areas. The results show that GRAFE’s waste profile is dominated by production-related fractions, particularly mixed polymer waste, plastic clumps, granulate waste, and industrial soot, most of which are treated through thermal recovery. At the same time, waste separation practices were found to be unevenly developed across the company. Polymer-related waste streams are more clearly assigned and have improved over time, whereas municipal-type workplace waste is often still disposed of in mixed bins. The waste characterization showed that recyclable or separately collectable fractions such as paper, plastic packaging, biowaste, and glass were present in mixed waste, especially in office and shared-use areas. The employee interviews indicated that limited separation was not primarily caused by a lack of environmental awareness, but by long-established routines, insufficient infrastructure, unclear disposal routes, limited visibility of sorting instructions, and spatial or operational constraints. The intervention introduced separate collection streams for paper, plastic packaging, mixed municipal waste, glass, and biowaste in selected non-production areas. Within the logic of an environmental management system, this intervention represents an initial Plan-Do step toward improved operational control, employee awareness, and future monitoring of waste separation performance. However, the study did not include a long-term post-intervention evaluation and therefore cannot determine whether the new system leads to sustained behavioural change, measurable waste reduction, or cost savings. Overall, the thesis shows that improving waste management at GRAFE requires not only technical disposal solutions, but also clearer documentation, workplace-adapted infrastructure, employee communication, and continual improvement. The study provides an empirically grounded first step for further developing waste management practices within GRAFE’s emerging environmental management system. It also highlights that targeted interventions can support broader organizational learning when linked to systematic documentation, employee involvement, and later review.
Waste management; environmental management system; ISO 14001; EMAS; waste separation; source separation; industrial waste; commercial municipal waste; plastics industry; polymer waste; plastic recycling; thermal recovery; circular economy; resource efficiency; operational control; environmental performance; workplace behavior; employee awareness; behavioral change; waste characterization; case study; GRAFE Polymer Solutions; Germany
Date of defence
29.05.2026
Result of the defence
Defended (thesis was successfully defended)
Grading
A
Process of defence
The student presented her thesis, its content and results. Afterwards, the supervisor’s and opponent’s opinions were read and questions were answered. Other members of the committee joined the discussion with the following questions. Assoc. Prof. H. Zlámalová Gargošová – Why did you sample just once a week? Assoc. Prof. P. Krystyník – Was there any surprising answer during the employee interviews? The student answered all the additional questions of the members of the Commission that were raised during the discussion on the issue. In the discussion the student demonstrated excellent orientation in the given issue. The discussion was followed by the evaluation of the thesis. The student demonstrated not only excellent professional knowledge but also the ability to independently present her results.
Language of thesis
English
Faculty
Fakulta chemická
Department
Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Environmental Protection
Study programme
Environmental Sciences and Engineering (NPAP_ENVI)
Composition of Committee
doc. Mgr. Renata Komendová, Ph.D. (člen) doc. MVDr. Helena Zlámalová Gargošová, Ph.D. (člen) Ing. Jiří Másilko, Ph.D. (člen) doc. Ing. Pavel Krystyník, Ph.D. (člen) doc. Ing. Tomáš Rozsypal, Ph.D. (člen) prof. Ing. Jozef Krajčovič, Ph.D. (předseda) doc. Mgr. Michaela Vašinová Galiová, Ph.D. (místopředseda)
Supervisor’s reportdoc. Ing. Pavel Diviš, Ph.D.
Grade proposed by supervisor: B
Reviewer’s reportIng. Tomáš Chorazy, Ph.D.
Grade proposed by reviewer: A
Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová