Master's Thesis

Development Activities in a Construction Company Operating in a Tourism-Driven Real Estate Market

Final Thesis 1.93 MB

Author of thesis: Turgay Baymammadli

Acad. year: 2025/2026

Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Iveta Šimberová, Ph.D.

Reviewer: BSc Ismayil Huseynov

Abstract:

The purpose of this master thesis is to investigate the development activities of a construction and real estate development firm: Miray Invest in Alanya, Turkey. The study concentrates on the management of the company's development activities in a real estate market oriented towards tourism and influenced by foreign buyers, economic fluctuations, exchange rate fluctuations and competition. The transition of the company from the traditional residential real estate development towards a more diversified company is given special attention, such as the quarrying of marbles, marble processing and export.
The thesis is written in the qualitative approach of a case study. The external environment of the company is analysed using PESTEL analysis, Porter's 5 forces and Stakeholder analysis, the internal environment through Organisational analysis, Digital maturity assessment, Sustainability assessment, SWOT analysis and McKinsey 7S framework. From the information provided in these analyses, the thesis concludes with the identification of the strategic gaps that can impact Miray Invest's long-term development, particularly with regard to strategic formalisation, digital integration, sustainability orientation and organisational coordination.
According to the result, Miray Invest has high growth potential in terms of market positioning, foreign customers and the diversification in marble export. The company also has some problems, such as reliance on the fluctuations of real estate demand, lack of formalisation of development activities, lack of digital integration, and need for a more systematic sustainability approach. Hence, the thesis suggests to develop a strategic business development plan with economic and financial assessment. The measures proposed are designed to increase the competitiveness of the company, increase coordination within the company, reduce risks related to development and promote more sustainable long-term development.

Keywords:

Real estate development, Miray Invest, Strategic growth, Construction Industry, Market Expansion, Sustainability, Digital Transformation, Competitive Advantage, Diversification.

Date of defence

12.06.2026

Result of the defence

Not defended (thesis was not successfully defended)

znamkaFznamka

Grading

F

Process of defence

In his presentation, the student informed the committee about the objectives, solutions and results he reached in his thesis. The committee then read the opinions and evaluation of the thesis supervisor and the opponent. The thesis advisor graded the thesis with a grade of "F" and the thesis opponent graded the thesis with a grade of "B". The student did not answer neither the questions from the supervisor's evaluation nor the questions from the opponent's evaluation. Questions from the committee members: 1. Ing. Budík - Is the company regulated in Turkey? - not answered 2. Ing. Schuller - Can you tell me any methods for risk analysis? - not answered 3. Ing. Schuller - Why did you not use any in your thesis? - not answered On the basis of the presentation and the answers to the questions raised in the discussion, the committee found that the deficiencies in the thesis were serious and decided that the student did not defend the thesis.

Language of thesis

English

Faculty

Department

Study programme

International Business and Management (MGR-IBM)

Composition of Committee

doc. Ing. Zdeňka Konečná, Ph.D. (předseda)
doc. Ing. Radek Doskočil, Ph.D., MSc (místopředseda)
Ing. Jan Budík, Ph.D., MBA (člen)
Ing. František Milichovský, Ph.D., MBA, DiS. (člen)
Ing. David Schüller, Ph.D. (člen)

The theoretical section is extensive, but it is more of a compilation of literature than a true theoretical synthesis. It lacks critical comparison, original synthesis, and discussion of different approaches. The methodology section states that a qualitative case study approach was used, but it does not describe how many interviews were conducted, with whom, or how the information was obtained and the data analyzed! The data methodology is not transparent. The analytical section is extensive, but it is not supported by hard data as one would expect; it lacks the author’s critical evaluation, scoring systems, evaluation criteria, or benchmarking. The proposal is reasonable and realistic, but relatively general. It lacks elaboration into specific implementation steps. Another weakness is the economic evaluation; the author admits that he does not use standard investment methods such as NPV, IRR, discounted cash flow, or the profitability index, although he does refer to Bradley’s investment evaluation.

The objective is composed very broadly, even though it was clearly defined in the formal requiurements in IS. The author states that the thesis analyzes development activities and their impact on long-term competitiveness. To achieve this objective, it was necessary to demonstrate the relationship between development activities and competitiveness, identify causal links, and document the impacts of the proposed measures. In reality, the thesis primarily describes the current state of affairs, identifies weaknesses, and proposes measures, but the actual impact on competitiveness is not analytically demonstrated! From my perspective, the author did not adhere to the objective as stated in the assignment, and the specified objective was not met!



There is a discrepancy between the original assignment and the actual content of the work. The assignment calls for the development of business activities, while the work itself focuses primarily on digitization, sustainability, diversification into marble exports, and organizational management.

Questions:

1. Explain why you changed your goals at work and deviated from the assignment, even though we discussed and agreed on it many times together?

2. Explain your approach to economic evaluation. Why did you not use NPV, IRR, or discounted cash flow?

3.The author states a payback period of 1.5–2 years, but it is unclear how this was calculated, what cash flows it is based on, whether investments in working capital are included, and whether inflation is taken into account. What is this calculation based on? Explain!
Evaluation criteria Verbal classification Grade
Meeting the objectives The author formulated the objective very broadly, even though it was clearly defined in the assignment. The author states that the thesis analyzes development activities and their impact on long-term competitiveness. To achieve this objective, it was necessary to demonstrate the relationship between development activities and competitiveness, identify causal links, and document the impacts of the proposed measures. In reality, the thesis primarily describes the current state of affairs, identifies weaknesses, and proposes measures, but the actual impact on competitiveness is not analytically demonstrated! From my perspective, the author did not adhere to the objective as stated in the assignment, and the specified objective was not met! F
Selected procedure of the solution, the adequacy of the used methods The analytical section is quite extensive; it is clear from the text that the author has a fairly good understanding of the company and is able to identify strategic issues. The connection between the company’s reality and theory is also evident, but many of the conclusions are not supported by data or arguments! Validated methodologies are missing; these are mostly the author’s expert judgments. There are no scoring systems, evaluation criteria, or benchmarking. The data collection methodology is not sufficiently transparent. The author declares a qualitative case study approach, but it is not clearly described how many interviews were conducted, with whom, how the information was obtained, and how the data was evaluated. E
The ability to interpret the results and to draw conclusions The interpretation is not based on data and arguments; rather, it consists of certain recommendations that lack coherence between their individual parts. The analyses are diagnostic rather than analytical. It is not clear exactly how the individual findings led to specific proposals. E
The practical usability of conclusions Given the previous evaluation criteria, the practical applicability is very limited. There is a lack of coherence between the data and the arguments. What we see here is more of a theory—a few analyses—and recommendations, but the expectation was: objective—research questions—methods—findings—proposals—economic validation. Although an effort has been made here, the coherence is not entirely convincing! There is a lack of a clear link between the analyses and the proposals. E
The thesis´s framework, formalities, used terminology and the professional level of language The organization of the work is average, and both the formal requirements and the technical language are somewhat weak. The structure is logical, but the theoretical framework is very broad and, as a result, is not operationalized at all (i.e., applied to the practical section). For example, strategic groups, mobility barriers, digital capabilities, and sustainability drivers are described in the theoretical section, but they are not systematically addressed in the analytical section. D
Using of information resources, including citations Working with information sources is average; it meets the requirements. C

Grade proposed by supervisor: F

Reviewer’s report
BSc Ismayil Huseynov

Whether the thesis has fulfilled the set objective:
The thesis has successfully fulfilled its primary objective. The author mapped out the strategic gaps of the company and outlined a logical roadmap toward export-oriented vertical integration. The theoretical goals and practical industry requirements are balanced appropriately.

The approach to solving the problem and the results of the thesis, specifying the specific contribution of the student:
The qualitative case study approach is suitable for this type of research. The student’s specific contribution lies in aligning internal company operations with established management frameworks. The results provide a useful baseline for strategic planning, though the final recommendations function more as a general framework rather than a dynamic operational model.

The formal layout of the thesis and its language level:
The academic English level is professional, clear, and fluent throughout the text. However, the formal layout shows minor signs of a rushed final edit. There are occasional sentence redundancies, repetitive phrasing in analytical summaries, and minor inconsistencies in the formatting of in-text citations. While these editing oversights do not disrupt the readability of the text, a more precise final proofreading would have enhanced the professional presentation of the work.
Additionally, inconsistent formatting in in-text citations (such as missing commas between authors and years on pages 14 and 18) further indicates that the final layout was rushed and lacks precise academic oversight.

Whether the thesis meets the standard requirements for a bachelor's or diploma thesis in the given field:
Yes. Despite the minor editing flaws and phrasing redundancies mentioned above, the thesis demonstrates sufficient analytical depth, a structured methodology, and practical relevance. It fully meets the standard requirements for a master's (diploma) thesis in the field of International Business and Management.

Conclusion
The thesis addresses a relevant strategic shift for Miray Invest: transitioning from regional real estate development to international marble quarrying and exports. The author demonstrates a solid understanding of theoretical frameworks (such as PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces, and McKinsey 7S) and successfully applies them to our operational environment. As a company, we consistently open our doors to both local and international students to support their academic research. This cooperation has been mutually beneficial, and the strategic framework developed in this thesis will serve as a useful reference for our future business development planning.
Evaluation criteria Grade
Meeting the objectives A
Selected procedure of the solution, the adequacy of the used methods B
The ability to interpret the results and to draw conclusions C
The practical usability of conclusions C
The thesis´s framework, used terminology and the professional level of language A
Using of information resources C
Topics for thesis defence:
  1. 1. Why is marble export important? 2. How can the company reduce risk 3. Why vertical integration?

Grade proposed by reviewer: B

Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová