Bachelor's Thesis

Analysis of the KZS layer in low-energy houses

Final Thesis 2.87 MB Appendix 13.33 MB

Author of thesis: Bc. Maximilian Szotkowski

Acad. year: 2025/2026

Supervisor: Ing. et Ing. Martin Tuscher, Ph.D.

Reviewer: Ing. et Ing. Daniel Kliment, Ph.D.

Abstract:

The presented thesis deals with the multi-criteria analysis of external thermal insulation composite systems (ETICS) and single-layer thermal insulation masonry, focusing on low-energy and passive building standards. Currently, there is an absence of a tool for the synchronous assessment of technical, economic, and environmental parameters in the pre-investment design phase, as a result of which designs are often burdened by information fragmentation. The aim of the thesis is to create a methodology and a calculation tool for the automated evaluation of these assemblies.
As part of the solution, a database was compiled based on the CS ÚRS pricing system, environmental product declarations (EPD), the SBToolCZ methodology, and manufacturers' technical data sheets. Based on this, an interactive calculation tool was developed to generate, assess, and filter assemblies according to the requirements for the thermal transmittance coefficient U. For compliant variants, four specific indicators per 1 m² of functional unit are exactly determined: financial cost [CZK/m²], installation time requirement [Nh/m²], environmental impact (GWP) [kg CO₂e/m²], and areal mass [kg/m²].
The tool includes a dynamic analytical module that evaluates the simple and carbon payback periods (PP, CPP) and the return on investment (ROI) based on the principle of differential costs against a reference uninsulated structure. The main output of the thesis is an optimization platform providing designers with an exact data basis for selecting an efficient and sustainable building envelope solution.

Keywords:

external thermal insulation composite system, single-layer masonry, low-energy house, carbon footprint, design optimization, cost, man-hours, weight

Date of defence

17.06.2026

Result of the defence

Defended (thesis was successfully defended)

znamkaAznamka

Grading

A

Process of defence

Závěrečnou práci obhajoval jasně a srozumitelně. Z jeho přednesu bylo patrné, že k úkolům, které řešil, přistupoval velmi zodpovědně. Na otázky členů komise odpověděl pohotově a s přehledem. Rovněž na doplňkové otázky od oponenta odpověděl správně a jasně. Státní zkušební komise závěrem konstatovala, že student svou závěrečnou práci obhájil na výborné požadované úrovni.

Language of thesis

Czech

Faculty

Department

Institute of Structural Economics and Management

Study programme

Civil Engineering (BPC-SI)

Specialization

Civil Engineering Management (E)

Composition of Committee

doc. JUDr. Ing. Zdeněk Dufek, Ph.D. (místopředseda)
Ing. Svatopluk Pelčák, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. et Ing. Martin Tuscher, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Radim Kolář, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Pavel Kocanda, Ph.D. (člen)
doc. Ing. Robert Kledus, Ph.D. (předseda)

Grade proposed by supervisor: A

File inserted by supervisor Size
BP_PV_Szotkowski.pdf 64,24 kB

Topics for thesis defence:
  1. Domníváte se, že se změní výsledky hodnocení a pořadí doporučených skladeb případových studií, když budou posuzovány na vyšší referenční životnost budovy 80 až 100 let?
  2. Pokud dojde k výraznému poklesu emisního faktoru elektrické energie, jak se to na analýze projeví?

Grade proposed by reviewer: A

File inserted by the reviewer Size
Posudek oponenta [.pdf] 202,42 kB

Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová