Přístupnostní navigace
E-application
Search Search Close
Master's Thesis
Author of thesis: Bc. Phillip Jones
Acad. year: 2025/2026
Supervisor: Ing. Robert Popela, Ph.D.
Reviewer: Ing. Robert Grim
This thesis presents the conceptual design of the Blind-Spot-1, a hand-launched fixed-wing small unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV) developed at the Brno University of Technology, together with an investigation into bone-inspired porous infill structures for its additively manufactured wing. Part I addresses the conceptual design itself. A market analysis of contemporary fixed-wing SUAVs in the 1–5 kg class establishes the operational envelope of comparable systems and identifies three capability gaps relevant to the BS-1 concept: limited sensor performance per unit mass, slow field deployment, and a modest endurance to weight ratio. From these gaps a design specification is derived, defining a 5.5 kg take-off mass, a 2.5 m wingspan in three modular sections, hand-launch capability, a target endurance of 60–90 minutes, and a high-performance EO/IR payload as the primary sensor suite. The aircraft is configured as a high-wing, pusher-propeller, V-tail platform with an MH 42 aerofoil, a piecewise-tapered planform with polyhedral outer panels, and a carbon-fibre spar in a FDM PLA airframe. Aerodynamic and stability analysis is performed in XFLR5 and XFOIL across loiter and cruise. A modular avionics and propulsion package is sized around a T-Motor MN3510 / APC 15×8E combination, a 6S 16 Ah LiPo battery, and a Gremsy VIO F1 radiometric EO/IR gimbal. Performance analysis and comparison with the AeroVironment RQ-11B Raven indicate that the BS-1 achieves a 95-minute mission endurance and carries a 854 g EO/IR payload, meeting or exceeding the benchmark on both metrics while remaining within the same operational range and launch envelope. Part II investigates the application of the Wu et al. bone-like porous-infill topology optimisation method to the BS-1 wing. The method is reimplemented from scratch as a 3D Python optimiser, validated on a rectangular test beam, and demonstrated on a representative slice of the BS-1 wing cross-section. A filter-radius sensitivity study identifies the geometric limit at which the method ceases to binarise cleanly on thin airfoil domains and establishes the Pareto-optimal filter radius for this geometry. The discussion concludes that, although the method converges on the slice, bone-like infill is not the optimal structural choice for the modular BS-1 wing; the compact multi-axis-loaded components of the airframe the wing-root fitting, motor mount, camera-bay frame, and V-tail hinges are identified as the natural application domain for future work.
SUAV, conceptual design, fixed-wing UAV, additive manufacturing, FDM, topology optimisation, bone-like porous infill, XFLR5, V-tail, modular airframe
Date of defence
11.06.2026
Result of the defence
Defended (thesis was successfully defended)
Grading
B
Process of defence
Student presented the outcomes, which he achieved in his thesis. Then, the committee heard the supervisor´s and reviewer´s report of master´s thesis. There were two questions from the reviewer´s report focused on criteria for determination of load magnitude and optimization of structure for production. These answers were displayed on individual slides and fully answered questions. Then, the committee asked several questions about criteria for evaluation of results, structure stiffness, suitability of manufacturing technology, thesis outcomes, production costs and manufacturing time, estimated mission performance, stiffness of camera mount, wing aerodynamic performance, center of gravity estimation, propeller design equation. The student answered all of them fully, without support, for the committee’s satisfaction. After this, the committee decided to evaluate the master´s thesis defense with the grade Very good B.
Language of thesis
English
Faculty
Fakulta strojního inženýrství
Department
Institute of Aerospace Engineering
Study programme
Aerospace Technology (N-AST-A)
Composition of Committee
doc. Ing. Jaroslav Juračka, Ph.D. (předseda) doc. Ing. Ivo Jebáček, Ph.D. (místopředseda) doc. Ing. Jiří Hlinka, Ph.D. (člen) doc. Ing. Pavel Zikmund, Ph.D. (člen) Ing. Miroslav Šplíchal, Ph.D. (člen)
Supervisor’s reportIng. Robert Popela, Ph.D.
Grade proposed by supervisor: B
Reviewer’s reportIng. Robert Grim
Grade proposed by reviewer: A
Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová