Master's Thesis

Conceptual study of small UAV

Final Thesis 13.51 MB

Author of thesis: Bc. Phillip Jones

Acad. year: 2025/2026

Supervisor: Ing. Robert Popela, Ph.D.

Reviewer: Ing. Robert Grim

Abstract:

This thesis presents the conceptual design of the Blind-Spot-1, a hand-launched fixed-wing small unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV) developed at the Brno University of Technology, together with an investigation into bone-inspired porous infill structures for its additively manufactured wing.
Part I addresses the conceptual design itself. A market analysis of contemporary fixed-wing SUAVs in the 1–5 kg class establishes the operational envelope of comparable systems and identifies three capability gaps relevant to the BS-1 concept: limited sensor performance per unit mass, slow field deployment, and a modest endurance to weight ratio. From these gaps a design specification is derived, defining a 5.5 kg take-off mass, a 2.5 m wingspan in three modular sections, hand-launch capability, a target endurance of 60–90 minutes, and a high-performance EO/IR payload as the primary sensor suite. The aircraft is configured as a high-wing, pusher-propeller, V-tail platform with an MH 42 aerofoil, a piecewise-tapered planform with polyhedral outer panels, and a carbon-fibre spar in a FDM PLA airframe. Aerodynamic and stability analysis is performed in XFLR5 and XFOIL across loiter and cruise. A modular avionics and propulsion package is sized around a T-Motor MN3510 / APC 15×8E combination, a 6S 16 Ah LiPo battery, and a Gremsy VIO F1 radiometric EO/IR gimbal. Performance analysis and comparison with the AeroVironment RQ-11B Raven indicate that the BS-1 achieves a 95-minute mission endurance and carries a 854 g EO/IR payload, meeting or exceeding the benchmark on both metrics while remaining within the same operational range and launch envelope.
Part II investigates the application of the Wu et al. bone-like porous-infill topology optimisation method to the BS-1 wing. The method is reimplemented from scratch as a 3D Python optimiser, validated on a rectangular test beam, and demonstrated on a representative slice of the BS-1 wing cross-section. A filter-radius sensitivity study identifies the geometric limit at which the method ceases to binarise cleanly on thin airfoil domains and establishes the Pareto-optimal filter radius for this geometry. The discussion concludes that, although the method converges on the slice, bone-like infill is not the optimal structural choice for the modular BS-1 wing; the compact multi-axis-loaded components of the airframe the wing-root fitting, motor mount, camera-bay frame, and V-tail hinges are identified as the natural application domain for future work.

Keywords:

SUAV, conceptual design, fixed-wing UAV, additive manufacturing, FDM, topology optimisation, bone-like porous infill, XFLR5, V-tail, modular airframe

Date of defence

11.06.2026

Result of the defence

Defended (thesis was successfully defended)

znamkaBznamka

Grading

B

Process of defence

Student presented the outcomes, which he achieved in his thesis. Then, the committee heard the supervisor´s and reviewer´s report of master´s thesis. There were two questions from the reviewer´s report focused on criteria for determination of load magnitude and optimization of structure for production. These answers were displayed on individual slides and fully answered questions. Then, the committee asked several questions about criteria for evaluation of results, structure stiffness, suitability of manufacturing technology, thesis outcomes, production costs and manufacturing time, estimated mission performance, stiffness of camera mount, wing aerodynamic performance, center of gravity estimation, propeller design equation. The student answered all of them fully, without support, for the committee’s satisfaction. After this, the committee decided to evaluate the master´s thesis defense with the grade Very good B.

Language of thesis

English

Faculty

Department

Study programme

Aerospace Technology (N-AST-A)

Composition of Committee

doc. Ing. Jaroslav Juračka, Ph.D. (předseda)
doc. Ing. Ivo Jebáček, Ph.D. (místopředseda)
doc. Ing. Jiří Hlinka, Ph.D. (člen)
doc. Ing. Pavel Zikmund, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Miroslav Šplíchal, Ph.D. (člen)

Supervisor’s report
Ing. Robert Popela, Ph.D.

Mr. Jones, in the frame of his diploma thesis, focused on two specific topics: the conceptual design of a small fixed-wing UAV and the bio-inspired design of its main structural component for 3D printing technology. He designed a surveillance and reconnaissance electrically powered unmanned vehicle and evaluated its performance.

In the second part of the thesis, he developed code for the design of a bone-like bionic structure intended for application in the vehicle. He optimized the topology of this structure for use in fixed-wing UAV technology.

Through this work, he demonstrated his ability to independently and creatively solve complex engineering problems.
Evaluation criteria Grade
Splnění požadavků a cílů zadání B
Postup a rozsah řešení, adekvátnost použitých metod B
Vlastní přínos a originalita A
Schopnost interpretovat dosažené výsledky a vyvozovat z nich závěry C
Využitelnost výsledků v praxi nebo teorii B
Logické uspořádání práce a formální náležitosti A
Grafická, stylistická úprava a pravopis B
Práce s literaturou včetně citací A
Samostatnost studenta při zpracování tématu A

Grade proposed by supervisor: B

Reviewer’s report
Ing. Robert Grim

This thesis focuses on the design and optimization of an unmanned aerial vehicle, with a focus on the use of 3D printing technology. The thesis is logically and systematically structured. In the first part, the student focuses in detail on the design of the platform itself, taking into account the specifics of additive manufacturing from the very beginning, particularly with regard to the geometry of the internal filling of the wing structure, as well as aerodynamic requirements for surface quality and deviations in profile geometry.
The second significant part of the thesis focuses on the optimization of the wing’s internal structure, where the goal is to find a suitable compromise between the weight, strength, and stiffness of the structure. To achieve these goals, the student employs optimization methods and an iterative design approach. I greatly appreciate the ability to link theoretical models with practical aspects, including the consideration of manufacturing deviations and their impact on the resulting aerodynamic properties.
I also positively evaluate the ability to critically interpret the results obtained, identify the limitations of the proposed solution, and compare performance parameters with existing competitive designs.
In general, the thesis meets all required criteria, and I grade it an A.
Evaluation criteria Grade
Splnění požadavků a cílů zadání A
Postup a rozsah řešení, adekvátnost použitých metod A
Vlastní přínos a originalita A
Schopnost interpretovat dosaž. výsledky a vyvozovat z nich závěry A
Využitelnost výsledků v praxi nebo teorii A
Logické uspořádání práce a formální náležitosti A
Grafická, stylistická úprava a pravopis A
Práce s literaturou včetně citací A
Topics for thesis defence:
  1. What criteria were used to determine the magnitude of the individual structural loads in Section 10.4.1?
  2. Based on your experience and considering the results of the work, is optimizing the structure a rational choice for the production of a small unmanned vehicle?

Grade proposed by reviewer: A

Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová