Student pracoval s relevantními zdroji k platformě Home Assistant, systémům řízení energie v domácnosti, fotovoltaice, komunitní energetice a existujícím komerčním i open-source řešením. Práce s literaturou je přiměřená prakticky zaměřené bakalářské práci; slouží hlavně k vymezení problému, srovnání dostupných přístupů a návrhu vlastního řešení.

Při dokončování práce proběhlo několik iterací připomínek a student na ně v podstatné míře reagoval. Práce se tak dostala do ucelené a obhajitelné podoby.

The presentation level of the work is good. The work summarizes the current state quite concisely. It also describes the proposed solution, implementation and evaluation. However, the author described the proposed optimization method somewhat briefly. He illustrated it with pictures, but they do not "help" much in understanding the proposed procedures. (The axes are not described in Figure 5.1 or 5.2, so one can only guess what they are supposed to represent.) However, the concept of integrating the method is already described well. In the description of the implementation itself, the author did not avoid providing not entirely necessary details that make the work difficult to read. In the testing and evaluation, a number of details are provided, but I do not see any simple example of calculating savings that would be suitable.

According to the attached documentation, video presentation and source files, the implementation output appears to be fully functional, but realistically I did not have the opportunity to verify it. In my opinion, it would have been good to give a better example of the "value" of the output in the text of the work. However, I still rate it as fully functional.

Evaluation level: zadání splněno

I believe that the assignment has been completed.

The work contains a number of literary references that represent good sources of information for the work, but unfortunately, many of them cannot be considered references to literature (for example, references [1], [3], [4], [7]... are links to Wikipedia and online documents that do not show signs of literature), some references are incomplete (for example, reference [5] is missing almost everything, similarly [17], [19]), etc. In general, I do not consider the section of references to literature to be well-written.