Master's Thesis

Design of the Precast Load-bearing Structure of the Building

Final Thesis 1021.14 kB Appendix 19.62 MB

Author of thesis: Ing. Andrej Čapek

Acad. year: 2025/2026

Supervisor: doc. Ing. František Girgle, Ph.D.

Reviewer: Ing. Lukáš Lyčka, Ph.D.

Abstract:

The diploma thesis deals with the design of a prefabricated load-bearing structure, which is divided into a production hall and an administrative building separated by an expansion joint. The ground plan of the structure has an L-shaped layout with maximum dimensions of 55 × 24 m. The production hall is a single-storey building arranged in a column structural system with a clear height of 8.2 m and an overall height of 9.95 m. An administrative building is attached to the hall; it is designed as a beam-and-slab structural system with three above-ground storeys and a total height of 11.77 m. The thesis is divided into a static analysis section, in which the structural system of the building and selected load-bearing elements are designed and assessed. In the production hall, the analysed elements include a pitched roof truss, a column, a column socket, and a beam above the entrance to the hall. In the administrative part, the analysed elements include the main and secondary beams forming a Gerber beam and columns with column base connections. Another part of the thesis consists of system drawings of individual storeys and fabrication drawings of the assessed elements. The structural assessment was carried out using manual calculations in Microsoft Excel and numerical analyses in SCIA Engineer 25 and IDEA StatiCa v.25. The drawings were prepared using Revit 25 and CADKON RC+ 2025.

Keywords:

Prefabricated production hall, administrative building, precast element, roof truss, column, beam, Gerber beam, column socket, corbel, cantilever, overhead crane, column shoe

Date of defence

05.02.2026

Result of the defence

Defended (thesis was successfully defended)

znamkaAznamka

Grading

A

Process of defence

Student představil komisi formou prezentace svoji diplomovou práci a reagoval na připomínky a dotazy oponenta vyjádřené v oponentském posudku i na otázky členů komise: prof. RNDr. Ing. Petr Štěpánek, CSc., dr. h. c.– šlo by ověřit průhyb ručním výpočtem redukovanou ohybovou tuhostí? - Student odpověděl. doc. Ing. Ivana Láníková, Ph.D. – jak jste uvažoval vzpěrnou délku sloupů? - Student odpověděl. doc. Ing. Ivana Láníková, Ph.D. - kontroloval jste průhyb pod jeřábovou dráhou? - Student odpověděl. Ing. Ondřej Januš, Ph.D. – Jak jste uvažoval pokládku panelů Spiroll? - Student odpověděl. doc. Ing. Petr Bílý, Ph.D. – Navrhoval jste v práci piloty? - Student odpověděl. prof. RNDr. Ing. Petr Štěpánek, CSc., dr. h. c.– Šlo místo navrženého železobetonového vazníku navrhnou vazník předpjatý a co by se změnilo? - Student odpověděl. prof. RNDr. Ing. Petr Štěpánek, CSc., dr. h. c. – Lze redukovat zatěžovací stavy od jeřábové dráhy? - Student odpověděl. doc. Ing. Ivana Láníková, Ph.D. – Jak jste zadával zatížení do výpočetního softwaru? - Student odpověděl. doc. Ing. Petr Bílý, Ph.D. – Popište návrh detailu uložení vazníku? - Student odpověděl.

Language of thesis

Czech

Faculty

Fakulta stavební

Department

Institute of Concrete and Masonry Structures

Study programme

Civil Engineering – Building Construction (NPC-SIS)

Composition of Committee

prof. RNDr. Ing. Petr Štěpánek, CSc., dr. h. c. (místopředseda)
doc. Ing. Ivana Laníková, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Martin Zlámal, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Radim Smolka, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. Ondřej Januš, Ph.D. (člen)
doc. Ing. Petr Bílý, Ph.D. (předseda)
doc. Ing. Lukáš Novák, Ph.D. (člen)

Supervisor’s report
doc. Ing. František Girgle, Ph.D.

Grade proposed by supervisor: A

File inserted by supervisor Size
Posudek vedoucího práce [.pdf] 167,18 kB

Reviewer’s report
Ing. Lukáš Lyčka, Ph.D.

Grade proposed by reviewer: A

File inserted by the reviewer Size
posudek_Capek.pdf 110,99 kB

Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová