Master's Thesis

Revitalisation of the Historical Core of Hostěradice

Final Thesis 407.46 kB Appendix 43.58 MB

Author of thesis: Ing. arch. Milan Chrobák

Acad. year: 2024/2025

Supervisor: Ing. arch. Adam Guzdek, Ph.D.

Reviewer: Ing. arch. Tomáš Jurák

Abstract:

The diploma thesis focuses on an architectural study of the restoration of the historic center of the village of Hostěradice. The subject of the proposal is the revitalization of the main square, the restoration of the historic town hall (building no. 52), and its surrounding area. The thesis also includes a proposal for a new functional use of the building. The aim is to revitalize the existing structure with an emphasis on appreciating its qualities and preserving its historical and cultural legacy.
The cornerstone of the proposal is the Renaissance town hall building, dated to the early 15th century. The key to its revitalization was finding a new functional use, which includes a restaurant, spaces for small businesses, a space for a children’s group, club rooms, and multifunctional areas for cultural and social events. An integral part of the design are also two new buildings that reference the historical, now-lost development, and complete the street frontage using traditional volumes. The first of these is a mixed-use building that houses a new club gym and four duplex starter apartments. The second is a family house with two separate apartments.
A crucial part of the proposal is also the revitalization of the square, which aims to reduce the impact of traffic load, increase safety, and improve the quality of the public space. Through the reorganization of the traffic layout, a new clear intersection and a one-way street along part of the square's perimeter have been created, including solutions for static traffic and public transport stops. The public space is enhanced with greenery that improves the microclimate and contributes to human psychological well-being. Thus, an old space is opened up to the public in a new, more welcoming, organized, and aesthetically pleasing form.

Keywords:

architectural study, revitalization, restoration, heritage preservation, Hostěradice, town hall, historical monument, cultural monument, renaissance, public space, gallery balcony, restaurant, childcare group, fitness center, maisonette apartment

Date of defence

17.06.2025

Result of the defence

Defended (thesis was successfully defended)

znamkaCznamka

Grading

C

Process of defence

Student úvodem prezentoval svůj projekt Revitalizace historického jádra Hostěradic. Byly přečteny posudky vedoucího a oponenta diplomové práce. Student reagoval na dotazy a připomínky oponenta a uvedla k nim podrobnější vysvětlení svého návrhu. Následovala odborná rozprava s dotazy komise: Umístění provozu dětské skupiny do objektu jste si zvolil sám a pokud ano na základě jakých podkladů? Je provoz dětské skupiny řešený správně? Jaký způsob přípravy jídla bude v kuchyni? Kde je navrženo parkování automobilů pro rodinné domy? Kde budou parkovat návštěvníci služeb umístěných v řešeném objektu? Jaká je minimální vzdálenost schodiště od dveří z hlediska bezpečnosti? Jaká je vaše filozofie a postup úvah návrhu fasád na historickém objektu a na navazujících novostavbách? Student se snažil vcelku velmi dobře reagovat na připomínky oponenta a zdůvodňovat svoje navrhovaná řešení, rovněž na většinu otázek členů komise k předložené práci reagoval velmi dobře.

Language of thesis

Czech

Faculty

Department

Ústav architektury

Study programme

Architecture and Urban Development (NPC-ARS)

Specialization

Architecture (ARA)

Composition of Committee

Ing. arch. Tomáš Zlámal (předseda)
Ing. Jitka Laura Vlčková, Ph.D. (člen)
doc. Ing. arch. Juraj Dulenčín, Ph.D. (člen)
Ing. arch. Dušan Vostrejž (člen)
doc. Ing. arch. Helena Hexnerová, Ph.D. (místopředseda)

Supervisor’s report
Ing. arch. Adam Guzdek, Ph.D.

Grade proposed by supervisor: E

File inserted by supervisor Size
Posudek vedoucího práce [.pdf] 108,22 kB

Reviewer’s report
Ing. arch. Tomáš Jurák

Grade proposed by reviewer: B

File inserted by the reviewer Size
Posudek oponenta [.pdf] 191,66 kB

Responsibility: Mgr. et Mgr. Hana Odstrčilová