Czech

1

Not applicable.

Department of Urban Design (UU)

By attending the lecture, the student gains an overview of the social problems connected with urban planning, information on disciplines, institutions and experts engaged in these interdisciplinary problems, and ability to understand the results of their studies

Knowledge of the main urban development processes, interest in extending the knowledge of relating disciplines, ability to orientate oneself in foreign-language (primarily English)
texts.

Not applicable.

Teaching methods depend on the type of course unit as specified in the article 7 of BUT Rules for Studies and Examinations.

Results of written examination are evaluated.

Introduction to the sociology
Sociological research
Urban sociology, social environmentalism cities
Sociology country, urbanization like social and cubic suit
Social theory groups, theory local groups and their application in urbanism
Demesne, territorial behaviour, theory neighbourhood and ward (neighbourhood)
Family and living, sorts living home and their incidence on inhabitant
Sociological piece of knowledge about new living sets and coffee - grounds.standpoint at reconstructions
Social and demographic aspects territorial scheduling
Social aspects demographic development
Social causes of loss after natural disasters
Social aftermath disasters
Social aspects life in marginal regions and small cities

Not applicable.

The objective is to make the students acquainted with basic sociological notions compiled with view to the needs of urban planning and, on the basis of research projects focused on sociology and social geography, with the social aspects of urbanisation processes.

Control tests in the course of lectures.

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Ferenčuhová, S. (2013) Sociologie města 20. a 21. století. Kapitola 2: Evropské kořeny ajadenucjí sociologie města a urbání teorie. SLON, s. 44–68. (CS)
Osman, R., Porkertová, H. (2020): „Upoután vozíkový“: absence zdvořilé nevšímavosti jako bariéra při pohybu prostorem uživatelů a uživatelek elektrických vozíků. Sociologický časopis. (CS)
World Health Organisation. 2007. Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Geneva: WHO Press. (česky: Globální města přátelská seniorům) (EN)
Český statistický úřad, Metodika SLDB 2011. (CS)
Harding, A., Blokland, T. (2014): "Spatial Expressions of Intra-urban Inequalities." In: Urban Theory. A Critical Introduction to Power, Cities and Urbanism in the 21st Century. Sage, s. 120–170. (EN)
Till, J. 2005. The negotiation of hope. In: Peter BLUNDELL-JONES, Doina PETRESCU a Jeremy TILL, ed. Architecture and participation. s. 19–41. (EN)

Ferenčuhová, S. (2014)”Sociologie města” In Šubrt, J. a kol. Soudobá sociologie VI (Oblastni a specializace), Krolinum, s. 21–41. (CS)
Harding, A., Blokland, T. (2014): Urban Theory. A Critical Introduction to Power, Cities and Urbanism in the 21st Century. Sage. (EN)
Navrátilová, B. (2011): Univerzální Design, http://univerzalnidesign.sweb.cz/ram.html (CS)
Navrátilová, B. (2016): Univerzální design a přístupnost staveb městské hromadné dopravy. České vysoké učení technické v Praze, s. 136. (CS)
Persson, H., Ahman, H., Yngling, A., Gulliksen, J. (2015): Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility— historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14, č. 4, s. 505 - 526. (EN)
Hamraie, A. (2017): Building access: universal design and the politics of disability. University of Minnesota Press, Mineapolis, s. 333. (EN)
Vidovićová, Lucie (a kol.). 2013. Stáří ve městě, město v životě seniorů. Praha, Brno: Sociologické nakladatelství, Masarykova univerzita. (CS)
Buffel, Tine, and Chris Phillipson. 2018. A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 30: 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1430414. (EN)
Pospíšilová, L., Novák, J. (2016): Mobile Phone Location Data: New Challenges for Geodemographic Research. Demografie 58(4), 320–337. (EN)
Groat, L.N. and Wang, D. (2002). Architectural Research Methods. 1 edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Především kapitola 7 ke kvalitativnímu výzkumu. (EN)
FOUCAULT, Michel. Priestor, vedenie a moc. In: Moc, subjekt a sexualita: výber z článkov a rozhovorov publikovaných v rokoch 1980-1988. Bratislava: Kalligram, 2000, s. 27-43. ISBN 80-7149-389-9. (CS)
Jones, P. (2011). The Sociology of Architecture: Constructing Identities. Liverpool University Press. (EN)
Klápště, P. 2014. Občané, architekti a veřejná správa: Určení rolí v participativních procesech [online]. B.m.: MPSV. Dostupné z: https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/obcane-architekti-a-verejna-sprava-urceni-roli-v-participativnich-procesech.aspx (CS)
Hušková, B., H. Chalupská, P. Klápště, M. Nawrath, L. Tomášová. 2016. Angažovaně offline aneb Čtyři praktické zkušenosti, jak se plánuje a navrhuje se zapojením veřejnosti. 2016. B.m.: NESEHNUTÍ Brno. (CS)

18 hours, optionally