Přístupnostní navigace
E-application
Search Search Close
Publication result detail
RIES, M.; HOSSFELD, T.; GARDLO, B.; SCHATZ, R.
Original Title
Microworkers vs. facebook: The impact of crowdsourcing platform choice on experimental results
English Title
Type
Paper in proceedings (conference paper)
Original Abstract
Subjective laboratory tests represent a proven, reliable approach towards multimedia quality assessment. Nonetheless, in certain cases novel progressive quality of experience (QoE) assessment methods can lead to better results or enable test execution in more cost-effective ways. In this respect, crowdsourcing can be considered as emerging method enabling researchers to better explore end-user quality perception when requiring a large panel of subjects, particularly for Web application usage scenarios. However, the crowdsourcing platform chosen for recruiting participants can have an impact on the experimental results. In this paper, we examine the platform's influence on QoE results by comparing MOS scores of two otherwise identical subjective HD video quality experiments executed on one paid and one non-paid crowdsourcing platform.
English abstract
Keywords
facebook, QoE
Key words in English
Authors
RIV year
2014
Released
05.06.2012
ISBN
978-1-4673-0724-6
Book
2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience
Edition
1
Pages from
35
Pages to
36
Pages count
2
BibTex
@inproceedings{BUT95042, author="Michal {Ries} and Tobias {Hossfeld} and Bruno {Gardlo} and Raimund {Schatz}", title="Microworkers vs. facebook: The impact of crowdsourcing platform choice on experimental results", booktitle="2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience", year="2012", series="1", number="1", pages="35--36", isbn="978-1-4673-0724-6" }