Publication result detail

Membrane-Based Carbon Capture for Waste-to-Energy: Process Performance, Impact, and Time-Efficient Optimization

PLUSKAL, J.; ZACH, B.; KŮDELA, J.; ŠOMPLÁK, R.; ŠYC, M.

Original Title

Membrane-Based Carbon Capture for Waste-to-Energy: Process Performance, Impact, and Time-Efficient Optimization

English Title

Membrane-Based Carbon Capture for Waste-to-Energy: Process Performance, Impact, and Time-Efficient Optimization

Type

WoS Article

Original Abstract

The energy crisis and rising waste production results in the need for more waste-to-energy solutions. However, capturing fossil-based carbon from waste incineration is crucial. The power consumption and overall impact of the carbon capture process are essential for the identification of the most suitable solution. The aim of this paper is to promote a time-efficient optimization, optimize a membrane-based post-combustion carbon capture process, and quantify its impacts on a waste‑to‑energy plant for various system configurations with different levels of CO2 recovery and purity. The proposed robust evaluation of the system with non-linearities resulted in the utilization of genetic algorithms with subsequent verification. Quantifying power consumption allows the comparison of different carbon capture technologies. The results confirm the importance of process optimization, show the influence of individual parameters, and quantify the disproportionate drop in power consumption with decreasing target CO2 recovery. The power consumption can be as low as 1.14 GJ/tonne of CO2 for CO2 purity of 95 % and recovery of 50 % and 1.66 GJ/tonne of CO2 for CO2 purity of 95 % and recovery of 90 %. The results also suggest that carbon neutrality can be achieved without compromising the R1 efficiency classification of energy recovery.

English abstract

The energy crisis and rising waste production results in the need for more waste-to-energy solutions. However, capturing fossil-based carbon from waste incineration is crucial. The power consumption and overall impact of the carbon capture process are essential for the identification of the most suitable solution. The aim of this paper is to promote a time-efficient optimization, optimize a membrane-based post-combustion carbon capture process, and quantify its impacts on a waste‑to‑energy plant for various system configurations with different levels of CO2 recovery and purity. The proposed robust evaluation of the system with non-linearities resulted in the utilization of genetic algorithms with subsequent verification. Quantifying power consumption allows the comparison of different carbon capture technologies. The results confirm the importance of process optimization, show the influence of individual parameters, and quantify the disproportionate drop in power consumption with decreasing target CO2 recovery. The power consumption can be as low as 1.14 GJ/tonne of CO2 for CO2 purity of 95 % and recovery of 50 % and 1.66 GJ/tonne of CO2 for CO2 purity of 95 % and recovery of 90 %. The results also suggest that carbon neutrality can be achieved without compromising the R1 efficiency classification of energy recovery.

Keywords

multi-stage membrane separation; carbon dioxide; process parameters optimization; genetic algorithms; Pareto front; power consumption minimization

Key words in English

multi-stage membrane separation; carbon dioxide; process parameters optimization; genetic algorithms; Pareto front; power consumption minimization

Authors

PLUSKAL, J.; ZACH, B.; KŮDELA, J.; ŠOMPLÁK, R.; ŠYC, M.

RIV year

2025

Released

30.11.2024

Publisher

Elsevier

ISBN

0360-5442

Periodical

Energy

Volume

310

Number

1

State

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Pages from

1

Pages to

11

Pages count

11

URL

BibTex

@article{BUT189614,
  author="Jaroslav {Pluskal} and Boleslav {Zach} and Jakub {Kůdela} and Radovan {Šomplák} and Michal {Šyc}",
  title="Membrane-Based Carbon Capture for Waste-to-Energy: Process Performance, Impact, and Time-Efficient Optimization",
  journal="Energy",
  year="2024",
  volume="310",
  number="1",
  pages="1--11",
  doi="10.1016/j.energy.2024.133229",
  issn="0360-5442",
  url="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224030044"
}