Neural Architecture Search and Hardware Accelerator Co-Search: A Survey

Neural Architecture Search and Hardware Accelerator Co-Search: A Survey

WoS Article

Deep neural networks (DNN) are now dominating in the most challenging applications of machine learning. As DNNs can have complex architectures with millions of trainable parameters (the so-called weights), their design and training are difficult even for highly qualified experts.  In order to reduce human effort, neural architecture search (NAS) methods have been developed to automate the entire design process. The NAS methods typically combine searching in the space of candidate architectures and optimizing (learning) the weights using a gradient method. In this paper, we survey the key elements of NAS methods that -- to various extents -- consider hardware implementation of the resulting DNNs. We classified these methods into three major classes: single-objective NAS (no hardware is considered), hardware-aware NAS (DNN is optimized for a particular hardware platform), and NAS with hardware co-optimization (hardware is directly co-optimized with DNN as a part of NAS). Compared to previous surveys, we emphasize the multi-objective design approach that must be adopted in NAS and focus on co-design algorithms developed for concurrent optimization of DNN architectures and hardware platforms. As most research in this area deals with NAS for image classification using convolutional neural networks, we follow this trajectory in our paper. After reading the paper, the reader should understand why and how NAS and hardware co-optimization are currently used to build cutting-edge implementations of DNNs.

Deep neural networks (DNN) are now dominating in the most challenging applications of machine learning. As DNNs can have complex architectures with millions of trainable parameters (the so-called weights), their design and training are difficult even for highly qualified experts.  In order to reduce human effort, neural architecture search (NAS) methods have been developed to automate the entire design process. The NAS methods typically combine searching in the space of candidate architectures and optimizing (learning) the weights using a gradient method. In this paper, we survey the key elements of NAS methods that -- to various extents -- consider hardware implementation of the resulting DNNs. We classified these methods into three major classes: single-objective NAS (no hardware is considered), hardware-aware NAS (DNN is optimized for a particular hardware platform), and NAS with hardware co-optimization (hardware is directly co-optimized with DNN as a part of NAS). Compared to previous surveys, we emphasize the multi-objective design approach that must be adopted in NAS and focus on co-design algorithms developed for concurrent optimization of DNN architectures and hardware platforms. As most research in this area deals with NAS for image classification using convolutional neural networks, we follow this trajectory in our paper. After reading the paper, the reader should understand why and how NAS and hardware co-optimization are currently used to build cutting-edge implementations of DNNs.

Artificial neural networks, Accelerator architectures, Design optimization, Optimization methods, Machine learning, Image classification, Computer aided engineering, Approximation methods, Evolutionary computation, Digital circuits

Artificial neural networks, Accelerator architectures, Design optimization, Optimization methods, Machine learning, Image classification, Computer aided engineering, Approximation methods, Evolutionary computation, Digital circuits

SEKANINA, L.

2022

16.11.2021

2169-3536

IEEE Access

9

9

United States of America

151337

151362

26

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9606893